A buddy of mine who works with search engine optimization (SEO) recently told me that the words “movie” or “film” are two of the worst search engine terms possible. Why? Because there are thousands upon thousands of websites out there devoted to film.

Most of these websites are small, niche-like sites that distract the owner every once in a while in between the cares of life; they’re the internet version of that old fixer-upper out in the garage. Oftentimes, some of the best stuff about movies can be found on sites like this. Some of my favorites include the brilliant Lazy Eye Theatre, the acerbic Burbanked, or the outrageously actress-centric Film Experience Blog. These owners write from their hearts, are often more knowledgeable than anyone ever armed with an Oscar ballot, and are absolutely more creative than the people on either side of the camera. Money is not their motivation – love of movies drives them. And in the case of Piper and Nathaniel, it drives them nuts.
Beyond the multitudinous myriads of niche movie sites, there is a fairly large core of serious and professional movie websites. They range from news and and insider-gossip blogs like the magnificent Hollywood Elsewhere or The Movie Blog, to more straightforward news and geek stuff like the efficient and well-oiled SlashFilm or older stalwarts like Ain’t It Cool News or CHUD. Up-and-coming pups like the ever-changing Obsessed With Film and First Showing fall into this more serious category as well. All of these sites, unlike their smaller and quirkier brethren, want to be taken seriously as movie authority figures and, to some extent, journalists.
Which leads me to the situation with Hollywood. Since the dawn of the internet, there has been a battle between the old guard of traditional media (newspapers and television critics and coverage) and the rise of internet media (blogs and websites). Hollywood has, for the most part, consistently favored traditional outlets – they’re easier to control through monetary means, have ties between parent corporations that can be manipulated or bartered, and have rules of fair play that can be enforced if necessary.
The internet is a much more difficult thing to master for Hollywood. The thousands of movie websites out there cannot be bought so easily or cheaply. Almost all of them are single-owner sites that have no bosses or authority figures editorializing their content. And as for rules … what stinkin’ rules?
When Obsessed With Film was approached by Fox on Saturday about my early look at the pirated version of WOLVERINE, we had two choices: take the material down from the site, or leave it up and risk the wrath of Fox. Since what we had up was in no way illegal, the only real risk we faced was being blackballed from future Fox materials and promotions. Given the disturbing state of much of their output lately, that might not seem like such a terrible compromise for the site’s artistic license. However, we took it down out of respect for their wishes, not wanting to disturb the general order of things.
For now, anyway.
You see, Hollywood is much like any of the corporations recently bailed out by the sucker-punched American taxpayers – they don’t want to see the end coming until it’s far too late to stop it. Until now, Hollywood has continued to live in a vast and luxurious bubble by the ocean, expecting to be catered to by her cadre of worshipful admirers. News corporations, television stations, theater owners, and even some big websites all tenderly lick her waxed undercarriage in the hopes of getting a small portion of her enormous wealth. While I’m sure people like Peter Ciretta of SlashFilm or Alex Billington of First Showing certainly love movies, they also love having a job where they cater to Hollywood, rather than pump gas at Citgo for $7 an hour. And so they play ball according to Hollywood’s rules, in turn reaping the benefits of such a relationship.
But the internet is slowly changing that game in much the same way that it’s changing the piracy of materials. In the old days, Hollywood could count on pressure to enforce its will upon movie news and review outlets. Even now, we see douche bags like Ben Lyons being coddled and bought for every idiotic phrase that slips out of his mouth. But for how much longer? You see, as traditional media outlets like newspapers rapidly sink into oblivion, Hollywood will only have those pesky movie websites out there to pump up the masses for the latest studio product. In that new world, those insignificant websites will now need to be Hollywood’s new best friends.
And that’s a problem Hollywood needs to address right now. Most websites do not need to conform to the rules of conduct and decorum once afforded to Hollywood in the days of kiss-ass corporate journalism. Nearly all websites do not have bosses, deadlines, tie-ins, or even editors. How can something like this be controlled, massaged, or directed? Simply put, it can’t. Sure, there will always be some websites that can suck goodies from Hollywood’s cock as well as any traditional outlet. But there will always be a vast and rapidly growing ocean of movie websites out there that cannot and will not be bought, no matter how many times you blackball them or toss lawsuits in their faces. The internet simply cannot be controlled.
It’s time for Hollywood to learn to co-exist with the new media.



9 Comments
You have forgotten to mention the greatest 80s-video-website in the universe: http://tinyurl.com/57zmwm
Aaaahhh, I am sorry. Just some shameless self promotion. Anyways, great read. Didnt know Brubanked before – yeah, what a shame – but looks pretty cool.
@ VideoRaider – Your site has one of the wildest designs on the internet … I have no problem promoting that work of art!! As for Burbanked, he publishes an article once a month or so … but it’s usually genius when he does.
Good read Ray. Here’s a question? How and why did sites like Peter’s and Alex’s get so popular that the studios pay attention. I like there sites just curious. Also Ive read that 99% of all traffic comes from the search engines so why do a small few get SO popular?
chuck
@ chuck – In the case of SlashFilm, Peter came from Cinematical, and he brought over a portion of his audience to begin the site.
As for First Showing, it remains a mystery. It’s fairly clear that Alex knows quite a bit about search engine optimization, even though his site name isn’t a great SEO term. One thing that some have suggested about him is that he used DIGG and other networking resources to pimp his site early on, which helped build it tremendously. It also helps him that the site is very clean and organized and easy to read … and it’s never changed format since its inception (unlike OWF, for example … the kings of reformatting).
I will say that I’m flabbergasted at First Showing’s success … the site is not updated that frequently, and it’s one of the worst examples of film critique and thought out there. Alex is the Ben Lyons of website owners, gleefully crowing about every fucking movie that comes down the pipe. I know he has been punished severely for some of his ridiculous lists, like his infamous “Top Seven Greatest Film Achievements” list that featured STARSHIP TROOPERS, for instance. The guy has enthusiasm, but he comes off a bit retarded when you read him daily. Which I don’t … I want to preserve as much brain material as I can so I can get drunk at night.
Anyway, some of it is just blind luck as well. A certain site just hits the right note at the right time … think Perez Hilton, here … and becomes huge. However, you really don’t need to have SlashFilm or AICN numbers to be successful. Just publish interesting content and place a few ads, and eventually it should work out alright. Just don’t quit your day job until you’re sure the bills are paid.
Ray
Your bluntness is refreshing and I must say very interesting!
chuck
@ chuck – LOL thanks, I guess … although my bluntness usually gets me in trouble from day to day.
Ray,
Well done. And thank you.
I’m sorry that I’m not timely enough to have seen the Wolverine footage, although my guess is that it wasn’t very good – at least judging from the trailers I’ve seen.
The current state of the economy hasn’t helped anything. To escape the shit, people will pile into any theater and watch… shit. I fear that this will keep Hollywood in their “bubble” for much longer – not that they would ever get out of it.
What amazes me is the money thrown at a bad film. Take Monsters vs. Aliens for example. They have a special segment during the Superbowl and they have all sorts of tie-ins to promote this turd, when all they could have done is sprung a little bit more money for a good script and some better animation. It doesn’t make sense to me.
But on the good side, have you seen Adventureland? It’s a great film and reminds me why I love movies so much.
Hollywood absolutely more creative But on the good side,.that one is very nice, though limited, it has got excellent qualities.This is very interesting site and i am glad to author.
Hi,
Guys, Hollywood is really more creative where we can see the movies for free online anywhere anytime in the online site.