THE DARK KNIGHT

r33r333333

In a post-9/11 world, can a hero be the villain? How far must that hero go to unravel the machinations of a villain without a desire to live? Must that hero become the very object he fights in order to vanquish the villain? And is his identity all he is willing to lose in order to win?

These complex, far-reaching questions and more bubble beneath the surface of the greatest comic book film to date. Masquerading as a crime drama, CHRISTOPHER NOLAN’S THE DARK KNIGHT tackles the weightiest issues of our day with precision and insight by telling us a story about a vigilante who dresses up like a bat.

Our story picks up with Batman (CHRISTIAN BALE) still fighting various factions within the Gotham crime underworld. The healthy respect for the pecking order is severely challenged with the arrival of The Joker (HEATH LEDGER), who intends to create anarchy among the wary gangs. Chief among his targets is hotshot District Attorney Harvey Dent (AARON ECKHART) and his girlfriend Rachel Dawes (MAGGIE GYLLENHAAL). Caught in the crossfire is the crooked police force, led by do-gooder Lt. Gordon (GARY OLDMAN).

The story is epic and intriguing, filled to the brim with interconnecting character motivations and storylines. All of the characters are pushed into difficult and unsuspecting places throughout the film, lending a decidedly adult air to the proceedings. Some reviewers have compared THE DARK KNIGHT to crime films like THE DEPARTED, but that comparison is unfair; THE DEPARTED didn’t have nearly this much story to tell. THE DARK KNIGHT is closer to films like THE GODFATHER in that it deftly weaves several major storylines together into a satisfying tapestry. The narrative leads to a conclusion that shoves Batman into a role that is both difficult and appropriate, perfectly setting up the emotional themes of the obvious third film.

The cast is uniformly excellent in their roles, although some suffer from being underwritten. Bale does what he can with Bruce Wayne, although Wayne barely appears in the film. Batman, however, shows up constantly throughout, the irritating growl from the last film unfortunately intact. Gyllenhaal, replacing the oft-scorned KATIE HOLMES, brings much-needed life to Rachel Dawes, imbuing her with a sexuality and intelligence that never crossed Katie’s pretty little brainwashed head. Other talents, like MICHAEL CAINE and MORGAN FREEMAN, are mostly wasted in brief cameos.

The film boasts two terrific, film-carrying performances. Oldman, marvelously restrained, provides the moral center of the film with his perfect incarnation of Lt. Gordon. While Oldman was good in the first film, he here expands Gordon’s righteous anger with a love and loyalty that makes the final showdown heartbreakingly unbearable.

The big story is, of course, Ledger’s performance as The Joker. Looking at the various incarnations of The Joker, one can easily see that the character takes on the mentality of the times; in the sixties, CESAER ROMERO’s Joker played simple little pranks, while the JACK NICHOLSON Joker of the eighties was malevolent while still retaining a playful, creative sense of fun. Ledger, however, plays his Joker like a suicidal psychotic with one trembling finger on the button. Ledger wildly flicks his lips around the edges of his torn, jagged lips, allowing his staggered words and darting eyes to reveal the intelligence behind his complex and devious plans.

While I am not quite convinced that the performance is Oscar-worthy, it is one you cannot forget or ignore. As THE CROW defined BRANDON LEE as a sort of counter-culture hero, so shall it be with Ledger here. His Joker is an iconic, stop-the-presses triumph of angst and insanity that will inspire a generation.

Nolan manages to keep the action crisp and palpable, with several sequences eliciting cheers from my audience. The action set-pieces – which are such based on their personal import rather than CGI effects – are staged and edited together wonderfully, with an only complaint coming from certain scenes in which it is difficult to ascertain the events.

The narrative, which borders ominously on the good side of incomprehensible, is labyrinthine and dense. This layering of the story pays off handsomely in the later stages of the plot. Insightful and attentive viewers are rewarded with a terrific finale that handles all of the interwoven storylines with cleverness and care. It is a rare and beautiful thing to see a comic book film treat its subject matter and its audience with respect, but THE DARK KNIGHT does so majestically.

In a summer filled with comic book adaptations that span the spectrum from excellent (IRON MAN) to decent (THE INCREDIBLE HULK) to awful (SPEED RACER), THE DARK KNIGHT has challenged expectations with a masterwork that achieves greatness. To call it a comic book film is too limiting; THE DARK KNIGHT is a great, great film.

Rating: ★★★★★

5 Comments

  1. I think Ledger’s performance was Oscar nod worthy, if not for a win – and I don’t think anyone has done nearly as well in a performance thus far this year. And while the narrative is long and winding, it isn’t incomprehensible – it’s just complex, which is what we should demand from movies that have fifty year histories in comics, books, and popular mythology.

  2. Mike says:

    spot on review. this is the best film based on a comic book movie i have ever seen. the story was ambitious, the performances were excellent, the action felt real, and it was funny, tense and heartbreaking. great fun.

    now, what can the do for a third?

  3. Mario says:

    I just got through reading a review by Jordan Hiller:

    http://www.bangitout.com/articles/viewarticle.php?a=2356

    And I must say that his review is decent for the most part, but it is because of people like this great franchises tend to fall apart. To sum up the author’s point he thought the movie was basically too dark and needed more light. As one of his commenter’s said, “It was a bit too dark and not enough Summer Blockbuster for me,” is basically saying, “take a lesson from Joel Schumacher.” Which of course is a HORRIBLE idea!

    Aside from that your review was decent and realistic!

  4. Jerald Brewer says:

    I have seen this movie twice now. Ledger’s performance is one for the ages. After the shock value wears off fom the 1st time you see it the deep dementia from which The Joker derives his sick kicks lies in the finesse of Ledger’s work upon 2nd viewing. (The 2nd time around also benefits Aaron Eckhardt & Christian Bale.)
    The Joker’s misanthropy as conceived by the Christopher & Johnathan Nolan and David Goyer and as brought to life by the actor is beyond –maybe, way beyond– that of Hannibal Lecter, Alex, John Doe & Keyser Sose. IT IS BRILLIANT!
    Right now I’m rating Ledger’s effort here as possibly topping Al Pacino’s in GODFATHER II on my all-time list.
    If Javier Bardem can win an Oscar for his latest performance then Ledger is a lock! (Of course, the Academy probably won’t even nominate him because of the $$$ HE DARK KNIGHT is making & the praise Ledger is getting. God forbid that Oscar rewards a very popular movie.)

  5. Klaus says:

    I was so shocked about the way American moral has changed in the years since 9/11.

    Before 9/11 the message was to fight for the truth no matter how hard it is… now it seems that it is ok to undermine the truth for the great good and it is ok to spy on everyone in order to fight evil. The world has become darker and therefor it is allowed to take on darker meassures.

    But has it really become a darker place or was it all propaganda from the US regime to have a better lead on the American citizens?

    Christopher Nolan has not made a critical movie towards the American common sentiment he has underlined it with his message.

    Have the American people changed since 9/11? The movie says that the common people have not. Because the captured people on the ferries didn’t blow each other up, even the criminals itself wanted to be better than they are branded to be, (Americans Unite). With this story line Christopher Nolan says that American people haven’t been brainwashed by the American government since 9/11 and he makes the American moviegoer happy being American. Someone who cannot be corrupted by evil someone who couldn’t be corrupted by the Joker.

    There was no interesting new thought in the movie. Batman wasn’t very intelligent. He had money, business power, good looks, gadgets, women but in all of this he was lost. The young lost rebel which is an American classic story.

Leave a Comment