“This is not what I wanted, I didn’t want it to happen this way” says Thomas Haden Church as The Sandman in the third and by far the weakest installment of the now overblown Spider-Man franchise. I’ve chosen that line of dialogue to begin this review because I believe it reveals something a little deeper about this film.
SPOILERS IN THE WHOLE REVIEW FOLKS
I believe the line is director Sam Raimi telling us something. I believe his vision for Spider-Man 3 has been tampered with and compromised with the addition of characters such as Gwen Stacy and Venom. I don’t think he wanted the characters in his film and that’s why they are treated poorly. Maybe I’m giving Raimi too much credit, but I’m shocked at some of the decisions that were made with this film and I think he is only partly to blame.
Spider-Man 3 is a sloppy and incoherent mess where it feels like there is 3 movies in one. The first two Spider-Man movies I thought were great because they introduced a villain slowly and every step was the logical conclusion of the scene before. Alfred Molina becomes Doc. Ock because of his obsession to create his new energy source. Willem Dafoe becomes The Green Goblin because of his ego in testing his new machine on himself, when it’s deemed unsafe to do so.
So just why does Eddie Brock become Venom in this movie? Because he was in the same church as Spider-Man when he is trying to take off his black suit? Why does the symbiote attach itself to Parker in the first place? A god damn meteor fell to Earth! Why the hell do Venom and The Sandman team-up after running into each other in the street and why is the scene like something out of the animated tv show? (which by the way, handled the story of Venom way smarter than these guys).
Lame choices are all too frequent, and Raimi lets coincidence fill in the blanks for reasonings behind character’s actions in the film, rather than he giving them a a purpose to exist with a better written script that this film so badly needed.
We all know that Raimi isn’t a fan of Venom, no matter what type of rebuttal he comes out with these days. We know he didn’t want the character in his Spidey films and I don’t believe we really have. Topher Grace’s role as Eddie Brock is poorly executed from a script standpoint and when he becomes Venom it’s even worse. What is his purpose in this film? The Green Goblin had a purpose. Doc. Ock certainly had one in Spider-Man 2. The Sandman kinda has one in Spider-Man 3 (well he begins with one, but with most things in this movie it is soon forgotten).
He’s just tagged on at the end to say “well there you go fans, there you go studio and Avi Arad, there’s your Venom… will you shut up about him now please?”. I absolutely hated that you kept seeing Eddie Brock’s face in the Venon suit. What was with his silly voice?
I felt nothing in the Venom/Spidey fight. Nothing but sheer boredom and that’s not what I wanna see when Venom is up there. It should have been exciting. Spider-Man up against his most formidable foe but alas Raimi’s heart wasn’t in it. There’s nothing like the great train sequence from the second movie, that’s now a distant past.
Why did we have to sit through another Mary Jane Watson (weak Kirsten Dunst) and Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) soap opera of a love story. We have seen that in the first two movies, that storyline is done. Mary Jane made her decision to be with Peter, we don’t want to seem them two bitching and whining at each other, AGAIN! Move on, give us something new.
And while we are on that subject, why the hell is Peter Parker with Mary Jane anyway? She does nothing but shout, bitch and moan at Peter and when there’s someone as hot and as nice as Gwen Stacy (who Bryce Dallas Howard beams with beauty in her limited screentime) who by the looks of things is the perfect women and girlfriend, you really have to wonder why he makes the choice to be with MJ.
Of course one of my favourite set pieces was the Bruce Campbell cameo and I bet ya’ll knew exactly when it was coming, as the camera slowly panned right in the restaurant. It could only be one guy who would get such an epic buildup. I loved the scene and it made me smile in what was mostly a joyless film although I was begging to see the much talked about Mysterio cameo which alas never happened.
There’s an idiotic change in the character of Peter Parker, where he suddenly becomes John Travolta in Saturday Night Fever which I’m not really quite sure how to mention. It’s kinda like that goofy scene in Spider-Man 2 where he is walking along to “rain drops keep falling on my head” but in this film Raimi pushes the button too far, and I felt like the audience’s laughter was more at the film than with it. It was painful to watch, an almost WTF laugh out loud.
You would think by the third film they would have made Parker grow up a bit by now.
A few questions left over then….
Why was James Cromwell in the movie for 2 shots only?
Does anyone not wish that Aunt May would die?
Why do we have to hear Kirsten Dunst sing… TWICE!!!!
Did anyone else think the Harry Osborn (James Franco) memory loss was the lamest thing ever? And if that fucking butler knew about the Green Goblin killing Norman Osborune… why the hell didn’t he tell him sooner?
Did anyone else think The Sandman character was really great and interesting with the problems with his wife and daughter, but then they just quickly forgot about that and his moral plight, until right at the very end where it was like “oh yeah, he loves his daughter. He ain’t a bad guy really”. I could see what they were doing. Raimi was trying to make him out like a Universal Horror Monster from the 30’s and 40’s and it nearly worked, but just needed a bit more fine tuning.
Spider-Man 2, which remember I have frequently called the “best comic book adaptation ever” is severely done an injustice here. Spider-Man 3 is a hard movie to watch, a painful, boring and joyless movie. What the hell happened? If I had a watch, I would have been checking it at least 30 minutes before this flick ended…. awful.
The special effects and some of the fight scenes are cool though. Some of Raimi’s best work actually.





That’s it, I don’t wanna see anymore Sam Raimi Spider-Man movies and thankfully I don’t think we will see any. His heart in the character is gone, it seems he was just doing a job here. Spider-Man 3 makes some crazy ass decisions and is a cluttered mess of a film that forgets about it’s moral center and the direction of where it is going. Hopefully, a new director is where it’s headed otherwise this franchise is done.
Categories: Reviews
Although I do accept many of the arguments you raise here, but you were bored!? I found the film highly entertaining (especially considering the lengthy run-time). I liked the cockyness of Parker, and I thought it added a nice light-hearted break from the action which clearly put a smile on everyones face.
Comment by Peter Willis | May 5, 2007
I thought Peter and Spider-man finally came together here. For the first time he really seemed to be having fun as Spider-man even before the black suit. Was it flawed? Yes, the entire third act felt rushed and shortchanged, but it was still highly entertaining and the audience I saw it with ate it all up minus a few corny moments (reporter/anchorman). They even loved the Saturday Night Fever Peter, everyone cracked up including myself.
Comment by Despacio | May 5, 2007
Matt, allow me …
Peter and Despachio, you are both horribly WRONG. You both must have a low threshold for excitement, because I know I certainly didn’t plunk down my money to watch an hour’s worth of a couple fighting and breaking up and crying. Unless your idea of entertainment is watching a boy and girl play fucking phone tag for an hour, then this movie is BORING.
Comment by Ray | May 5, 2007
And now on to Matt’s review…
Matt I agree with almost everything you said here; I sat in open-mouthed shock at the ineptitude of this film, and as you know I am not even a fan of the first two films.
In my own review at http://www.therecshow.com, I didn’t even bother with the villains in the film - this movie is basically about Spiderman’s love life anyway. But since you bring it up here, let’s talk about them:
The New Goblin - This one should have had a tremendous impact, because it’s been building for three movies. However, the amnesia thing was LAME and poorly done. The butler walking onto the set and delivering CRUCIAL information to cause Goblin’s turn was one of the worst scenes I have witnessed in a modern-day blockbuster, and I saw “Star Wars 2 - Attack of the Clones.”
Sandman - Where’s his motivation?? They introduce his daughter being sick, and that “more money” will help her … HUH? What’s wrong with her? What does she need?? Then Sandman is fingered as Ben’s killer - DUMB. Then the “character” changes back and forth; first he’s remorseful, then he’s robbing banks, then he’s angry for no apparent reason. I mean, in the space of about five minutes, Sandman goes from being a towering, GROWLING monster who is trying to kill Spiderman, to having a tearful apology sequence with him. WHAT??? Is he Sandman or the Incredible Hulk??
VEnom - Total coincidence bullshit. Barely in it. Poorly defined.
To add insult, Raimi spends no time setting up the huge finale of the film; Sandman happens to meet Venom in an alley, and within 5 seconds they decided to team up to kill Spiderman, and for no particular reason.
WOW … damn this is one shitty movie.
Comment by Ray | May 5, 2007
The first couple of fight scenes were cool but when it came to the last couple and their was clearly no effort to make us feel for any character’s plight… I just got bored.
It’s like all the fight scenes from The Matrix sequels. They are boring because we aren’t given enough close character interaction like the first movie. Neo’s motiviation wasn’t enough to make me interested in those fight scenes and neither did Peter Parker’s in this.
Comment by Matt Holmes | May 5, 2007
Hi;I totally agree with the review.I am from South Africa and saw the movie on the weekend(Saturday may 5th) and after all the advertising build-up boy was I dissappointed.The first two movies really blew me away and upon hearing that VENOM was going to be in the third I expected a truely great movie.But what we got was DAYS OF OUR LIVES with action.
If there is going to be a fourth I hope is worth the price of a ticket.
Comment by Kamal | May 8, 2007
[...] 3 is easily my biggest disappointment of 2007 so far but you can read my full review for my full thoughts on that. The bottom line to me and what became obvious when watching the film was Sam Raimi didn’t [...]
Pingback by Obsessed With Film » Spider-Man 3 DVD Cover Art & Details | August 4, 2007