Posted by Matt Holmes. Last modified on September 7th, 2008 at 12:24pm

Matt is no fan of Ritchie’s ROCKNROLLA

rocknrolla

“There’s no school like the old school”, proclaims head mobster Lenny Cole (Tom Wilkinson) in RocknRolla, the latest piece of incoherent and pretentious garbage from Brit writer/director Guy Ritchie who after a decade in this business still feels like an insecure teenager taking up smoking so that he can look cool.

You know the kind I mean, the teenager who doesn’t really like the taste but does it anyway because that’s what his mates do. He wants to fit in, look cool. He buys himself a leather jacket and wears sunglasses. He watches Arnie in The Terminator and thinks it would be cool to ride a bike.

It’s not cool, it makes him a fake. And Guy Ritchie to me feels like a fake. Nothing ever rings true in any of his films.

Progressing not an inch from his days on Lock, Stock and Snatch, RocknRolla harbours all the previous elements of his filmography into a mix that attempts to be funny, cool and highly stylized popcorn entertainment. Though in reality, it barely even registers on any of those low reaching levels.

rocknrolla1big

Filling in for the presumably busy Jason Statham is the ever growling Scot Gerard Butler who I suggest as One, Two (you seen the nonsense we are dealing with here?) is the good guy of this piece because among the racists, bigots and homophobes that are present in the film, his best mate is gay (a terrific performance from the ever likeable Tom Hardy as Handsome Bob) and his partner in the criminal underworld, is a black man named Mumbles (Idris Elba).

They are low grade gangsters, moving from quick and easy one shot jobs that earn them enough money to get by. They live the RocknRolla life.

When a Russian mobster (who has an expensive football box, owns a yacht… a Roman Abramovich caricature from the not so subtle Ritchie) puts to work on a real estate scam to earn him more millions, One Two and Mumbles are given the job by an flirtatious accountant Stella (Thandie Newton) to steal the money, where she will of course take a princely cut herself.

rnr-00723-hq

From there, twists and turns occur a plenty, involving mob boss Lenny Cole’s young son, a druggie rock-star by the name of Johnny Quid (Tony Kebbell), two characters I never did understand played by Americans Jeremy Piven and Chris “Ludacris” Bridges and a really solid performance from Mark Strong as Lenny’s No. 2.

If there is one thing Ritchie has got right, it’s the casting of Prof. Moriarty for his upcoming Sherlock Holmes movie because this guy can portray as evil as it gets without doing much with his face. A terrific actor, and I enjoyed his presence here.

bfrock

Anyhow, there’s just no substance to this film, characters, scenes and situations just have no value. Every moment of the film is played for a “wink to the audience and look how cool we are” montage of shots. Look how cool Gerard Butler is as a hard man. Look how sexy Thandie Newton can walk in heels. Let’s film their long anticipated (in the movie) sex scene as a 3 second montage. Look how clever I am to have created the main prize of the movie be a painting we never see.

Boring. Tarantino did everything Ritchie does now, years ago… and way superior.

The problem I’ve always had with Guy Ritchie is that there are no reasoning to his films. No reason why he shoots something one way and then shoots the next scene in another. He speeds some scenes up, then will film the next as a slowdown but with for no reasoning or value. There’s no end result, he has no plan he just films each scene the way he wants to, the way he thinks will amuse him and look the coolest. The problem is, the kid who tries too hard to be cool… looks like a fool.

Ritchie should learn a thing from Joe Carnahan whose Smokin’ Aces was similar in many ways to this movie but a thousand times better. His characters more defined, some (most) sympathetic on some level, his camera gimmicks actually had a purpose to progress and enhance scenes, he had great moments of emotional substance, better use of music, better plot and more. Smokin’ Aces actually carried a lot of value but this one is just awful and I’m not surprised that Warner Bros. are dumping this film in the U.S. with a soft release.

32939137-a41f-955b-b02e2b1a0d282240

And then there’s a grossly unfortunate scene, especially in today’s climate in this country, of a stabbing assault with a pencil on a nightclub bodyguard which was played purely for violence fetishism and glorification. The scene make me me grimace that in a theatre where I was in packed full of older teenagers, the 17-19 crowd, that the movie whole heartedly promoted violence at every level.

Sure there was the infamous “magic trick” in The Dark Knight, a stabbing to the eye with a pencil but it never condoned violence the way this movie does. And The Joker was clearly the villain of that piece, in RocknRolla and particularly that scene, the man dishing out the violence is the good guy… I think.

Guy Ritchie, in Bond fashion at the end credits proclaims that the characters will return in “The Real RocknRolla“.

I seriously hope not. Man do I fear for his Sherlock Holmes now, he has to grow up for that movie. It has to happen now.

★½☆☆☆

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Categories: Guy-Ritchie, Reviews, RocknRolla, Top Stories

10 Comments »

  1. Lol. It wasn’t that bad. I gave it 2 out of 5.

    Comment by Roars | September 10, 2008

  2. I agree it was an OK film, not a bad one by any means.

    I would also argue that if anything it imitated Scorsese - especially in the voice-over led, fast paced extended montage sequence that opened the film - and not Tarantino.

    Comment by Paul | September 10, 2008

  3. I am soooo tired of people being violence pussies..

    80’s action movies were the best. unrealistic scenarios, mega violence, and unlimited clips.

    Why the fuck do i have to bow down to stupid ass people that use film as a scapegoat for everything. People where murdering way before movies and people continue to murder far past movies. I love violence, the more the merrier (MOVIE violence). I am a well adjusted adult that goes to work, pays his bills and is generally nice to everyone. WHY am i not be allowed to watch unapologetic violence?

    i know this input really doesn’t have much to do with the review but when i read the quote, “..And then there’s a grossly unfortunate scene, especially in today’s climate in this country, of a stabbing assault with a pencil on a nightclub bodyguard which was played purely for violence fetishism and glorification..”

    I LOVE THAT STUFF!!! i could give a rats fuck who finds it offensive and unncessary.

    people that hurt people have problems of their own and i highly doubt that a fuckin movie will make that worse. I am just sick and tired of “movie violence” gettin a bad rap. we are all becoming a world of sensitive pussies. Man up, this movies about MOBSTERS!!!!

    Comment by Brandon Dorrin | September 10, 2008

  4. If the reviewer was offended by the pencil stabbing scene, they should probably steer clear of Rambo. He kills this one guy with his fucking hand!! Whatever next?!

    lol.

    Comment by Roars | September 11, 2008

  5. Matt, you’ve lost it. The movie is worth 1 and a half stars for the opening credits alone!

    As a guy who has never liked any of Ritchie’s work you were probably not the best man for the job when it came to reviewing this. Guy Ritchie is, I guess, someone who appeals to people like myself who don’t go to movies and be concerned by a copycat director or doing things they he wants just because he thinks it looks cool. I went to see the movie with 4 friends, and we all agreed the end result WAS cool.

    And FYI I wouldn’t suggest Jonny Quid as anything of a good guy. Quite the opposite. In fact, there were no good guys - besides maybe Archie (aka Dimitar Berbatov).

    For fans of Ritchie’s Snatch and Lock Stock british gangster capers, you’ll love this.

    ****

    Comment by Peter Willis | September 12, 2008

  6. Roars,

    Your not using your head mate, though I haven’t actually seen RAMBO.

    ROCKNROLLA is not a war picture. Guy Ritchie’s film promoted that the good guy, who was wrongly not let into the nightclub… was well within his rights and sympathised by the director that stabbing a nightclub bouncer several times, violently, with a pencil was perfectly fine.

    You can’t compare that to a war film.

    Comment by Matt Holmes | September 12, 2008

  7. Don’t be silly Matt. I was just pointing out your apparent distaste for over the top violence, (which Rambo certainly is).

    But honestly, the pencil stabbing scene was no worse that Joe Pesci stabbing that guy in Casino with a pen. Of course, you probably won’t criticize that because it’s Scorcese, right?

    Mook ;)

    Comment by Roars | September 12, 2008

  8. Oh, and Peter. Glad I wasn’t the only fucker who thought Archie was a dead ringer for Berbatov.

    Comment by Roars | September 12, 2008

  9. havent seen this flick, but this?: ‘Smokin aces actually carried a lot of value’…say what? That movie was a incoherent piece of crap

    Comment by Ruud | September 15, 2008

  10. Wanna express your opinion further there Rudd?

    Comment by Matt Holmes | September 15, 2008

Leave a comment

Just an empty space
Obsessed With Film © 2008