By the time any series reaches its sixth act, the joys and revelations within are only for the initiated and loyal. Anyone unfamiliar or indifferent with the previous episodes are left baffled and confused by the characters and the subtleties of their situations.
Even by that difficult standardD PRINCE!, HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF BLOOD PRINCE can only be truly enjoyed by the diehard fans of the series.
Picking up from the tumultuous events of ORDER OF THE PHOENIX, the film follows Harry, Hermione, and Ron through their sixth year at Hogwarts. Hormones are raging, and the three leads find themselves blindsided by the opposite sex. Their burgeoning desire for “snogging” distracts them from the Death Eaters swirling around the school, as well as the mysterious sulking of Draco Malfoy, who seems to be pressed with a heavy burden.

What miraculous choices Chris Columbus made in casting these three young actors so long ago! Rupert Grint really cuts loose in this installment, showing a keen sense of comic timing as Ron. Beautiful Emma Watson continues to deepen her interpretation of Hermione. But best of all is Daniel Radcliffe as Harry. He simply IS Harry Potter, and this is his best performance in the role. The three interact so well together, having had the unique opportunity to grow together like real friends on and off screen. Their chemistry together is formidable.
Beyond the three leads, the performances are spotty. Michael Gambon does solid work in the pivotal role of Dumbledore, managing to infuse some necessary humanity to the part. And, of course, Alan Rickman is awesome yet again as Snape, although he is never in any of these films as much as I’d like. Unfortunately, Helena Bonham Carter is allowed to painfully overact again as Bellatrix Lestrange, which now officially makes approximately fifty over-the-top performances in a row. Can someone please put a muzzle on her?
But it is Jim Broadbent’s performance as Professor Slughorn that really cements this film. The character is wonderfully imagined and written by J.K. Rowling and screenwriter Steve Kloves, but Broadbent layers in palpable regret and shame in between the laughs. It is a tasty and nuanced performance.
Director David Yates does a stylish and inventive job with the direction, and several scenes stand out nicely. He also handles the effects well, incorporating them just enough to emphasize the film, rather than overwhelm it. The film has a colder tone to it, and the cinematography pushes this with its chilly tableau of blues and grays. After AZKABAN, this might be my favorite direction and cinematography in the entire series.
Where the film goes wrong is with the story – there is none. Unlike the other films in the series, this movie has no plot whatsoever. The main function of this 2.5 hour film is to have fun with teenaged romance and set up the events of the final chapter. And frankly, that’s a bit much to ask of most audiences. The characters and situations are endearing, but a film should ultimately have a story to tell, and this movie is seriously lacking one.
That lack of story partially blunts yet another climactic showdown. In PHOENIX, the death of Sirius Black happened without even a whiff of drama or pathos. Here, another character’s death is treated similarly, entirely lacking in gravitas and suspense. Too much of this overlong movie feels lightweight, and it fails to build to a satisfying climax.
When I mentioned these nagging problems to my friends who have read the series, they became defensive. They loved this movie. I, on the other hand, have never read the books and have only seen each movie once. Perhaps I’m not as invested in these characters as the millions of fans of the series, thus tainting my view of this movie.
But I will say that I expect an engaging story from a film that asks almost three hours of my life. HALF BLOOD PRINCE has enjoyable moments, but it still feels like only half of a movie.



9 Comments
Your comments about lack of plot i think actually stem from a problem of the book itself. It suffered from exactly what you describe. It’s all exposition to set up book 7, with a smattering of sub plots, none of which really grab you. However… the exposition was unfortunately needed in order for the series to end strongly. Which, in the books at least, it does.
Well, it is obvious that the person that wrote the review did not read the books. It is a sad state- like someone reviewing food that grew up on oatmeal- he would not know something good if he had it.
Harry Potter may be for the fans only- so don’t review the movies if you are not going to take the time to know what they are all about in the first place. It is insutling. The movie is wonderful and will not let down the fans at all. The special effects in the movie continue to shine and add to the story.
I will agree that Bellatrix does need to be hosed. She is suppose to be crazy with her devotion to Lord V, but foaming at the mouth all the time is getting old. This movie does focus on the personal/emotional side of the story. The comments of the reviewer about the death of Dumbledore just hows his ignorance. The sacrific of his life is very dramatic- possibly the reviewer is not sharp enough to get the subtle message. The Potter story does not need to scream the obvious. Without the story background, I am sure his death was puzzling and more than he could comprehend. I guess he did not watch the trailers or any of the lead in material.
L
I don’t know what your point is to be honest Leanne. Ray clearly mentioned that he’s neither never read the books… and that fans loved it.
“When I mentioned these nagging problems to my friends who have read the series, they became defensive. They loved this movie. I, on the other hand, have never read the books and have only seen each movie once. Perhaps I’m not as invested in these characters as the millions of fans of the series, thus tainting my view of this movie.”
@ Leanne – I’m approaching this film as a FILM, not as part of some untouchable cultural icon. It doesn’t work as a standalone film AT ALL. And even as part of the series, I think it’s one of the weaker entries simply because nothing much happens for most of its overinflated running time. At least the other films had a story to tell. This one seems to be a collection of funny flirting scenes until the abrupt end arrives.
I’m not saying I hate the movie or anything. It’s very well made. And I’m sure the fans of the books will enjoy revisiting their beloved friends again. But as a film, it doesn’t really work.
David Yates (director) did a superb job just magnificent to watch, may be Alfonso Cuarón would have made them ROCK. I am a great fan of Harry Potter series. My favorite still remains HP3: Prisoner of Azkaban. But Half Blood was simply outstanding on levels. I’ll be seeing it again Saturday on IMAX which will be even better as it’s one of the original IMAX screens that loom up and over the audience as opposed to newer screens that are just big.
Being a great fan I have collected a list of good sites and articles (may be around 200) related to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (movie information, movie schedule, movie reviews, books, games, news, wallpapers and many more). If you are interested take a look at the below link
http://markthispage.blogspot.com/2009/07/all-you-want-to-know-about-harry-potter.html
I’m someone who has read all the books so many times I could win Mastermind on my special subject of Harry Potter.
That said, I completely agree – this movie does NOT stand up as a story on its own.
For one thing, it’s called “The Half Blood Prince” and the identity of the Prince is the central mystery of the book. But this seems hardly mentioned in the movie.
Without knowing the book you could not be expected to understand why anyone might wonder who the owner of the old potions textbook might have been. Are they good? Are they evil? There is nothing to make you wonder about it.
When Snape tells Harry at the end that he is the Half Blood Prince, it’s almost a “Yeah? So what?” moment in this film.
The book is essentially about Snape, so you can understand his character and motivations later, in book 7, but in this movie he is almost an extra and that is so disappointing.
If you haven’t read the books Ray, how can you say with any real authority that Radcliffe IS Harry Potter? That kind of makes no sense if you have no real knowledge of the literary character.
If for one think Radcliffe is a bloody awful actor.
@ Barn – Fine. I retract that statement. Happy now?
Suppose.