Mike endures the agonising BAYFORMERS 2; the things we do for our readers, ya know?

Posted by Michael Edwards on June 17, 2009 – 2:56 pm | 11 comments

Before we start, let me just quickly establish a couple of terms:

Transformers; a group of robots created in the 1980s capable of changing shape in to various recognisable machines. Two bands known as Autobots and Decepticons are locked in an epic battle which will decide the fate of humanity.

Bayformers; film series in which the aforementioned Transformers are parodied as a group of wise-cracking cartoon characters who are fighting for the fate of the USA and its accompanying galactic hegemony.

Now, onto the review… Sweet Jesus! Does Michael Bay not know how to make a movie? Someone needs to send him back to film school. Watching Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen convinced me that he speaks to political advisers, image consultants, the creators of Ren and Stimpy, and animators before he realises he needs scriptwriters.

transformers-2-reven

Bayformers 2 is a mess of a story loosely glued together with lame jokes, fighting pixels and Megan Fox’s ass. The worst thing is that I kind of enjoyed some of it, which leads me to question my own sanity, but also to question how necessary is plot in a film that’s all about the spectacle – the smell of the jet fuel, the sound of the computer-generated metallic crunching noises, the waft of the American flag as it is brutally knocked from it’s noble perch by those arab terrorists… I mean… Decepticons. Do these things need to be encased in an interesting and well-crafted tale?

For the first 45 minutes, possibly even the first hour, of this 147-minute ‘epic’ I was cringing away from a wall of noise, quietly begging Bay to insert at least a small piece of plot at some point. Sure, he had set up some stuff: the Autobots were being rejected by a suspicious global community that was beginning to believe it was them that the Decepticons were looking for on Earth, meanwhile The Fallen (one of the original Transformers who turned evil) is set to rise again from his resting place somewhere in the solar system. Oh, and Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) is off to college, leaving behind hot girlfriend Mikaela (Megan Fox). But all this was really window dressing for the early battle scenes and some lame family comedy-drama with the Witwiky’s.

iwdjiojdiod

But after that period of time I fell into a Bay-induced coma (or possibly suffered from a mild epileptic seizure) and began to chill out. Was it really that bad alternating between university girls in skimpy clothes and giant CGI robots fighting? Were the Bad Boys-esque gags embodied by Bayformer duo Mudflap and Skids really that much of a distraction from the cooler robots? I wasn’t sure for a while. But then came the build-up to the ‘dramatic climax’ of the film and I think I had the answer: Yes, it’s fucking terrible. Films need plots and Michael Bay should stop this nonsense now.

Worse still, Michael Bay might not be expected to produce an excellent story filled with nuanced characters and portrayed by well-directed actors, but he could at least make the robots awesomely destructive and the stupid sidekicks genuinely funny. But in Revenge of the Fallen the boundaries blurred and the film was swamped with campy Bayformers who were used more for insultingly stupid jive-talking and puerile cock jokes than for smashing the shit out of each other. I couldn’t even enjoy his characteristic jingoism with its bombastic sweeping shots of aircraft carriers and gung-ho soldiers because the film was so flagrantly attempting to covertly convert millions of children into believing that the US should send its troops back to Iraq.

jpojwrpojopr

One scene in particular embodied this last point perfectly: as US troops, accompanied by a crack squad of Autobots, holed up around a stereotypical Arab shanty town near Giza they suddenly realised they had support. “It’s the Jordanians!” Hurray, support! And from a Middle-Eastern ally. Oh, wait, the helicopters have INEXPLICABLY CRASHED! Oh those silly Arabs, can’t they do anything right? It made me sick.

But, my political indignation aside, this film is worth watching in two situations: (1) You do not have a brain and must rapidly fill your head with bullshit, (2) You do not have an internet connection and want to watch softcore porn so badly that you are willing to have bad jokes shouted at you relentlessly for two-hours and twenty-seven minutes.

The trailers, which showed some jaw-dropping shots of robot carnage and some superbly crafted robot animation had genuinely whet my appetite for this sequal. I wasn’t a huge Bayformers fan, but I do like a good action film, and this seemed to promise it. But the frequency with which any scene that look stylish or exciting was interrupted by inane chatter and pointless buffoonery completely ruined any enjoyment that could have been had in this unnecessarily long movie. So perhaps films do not need a good story, but it sure would help. Particularly when you’re relying this heavily on wise-cracking CGI robots.

Review by Michael Edwards, Chief Film Critic of Obsessed With Film

11 Comments

TONY on June 17, 2009 at 7:59 pm

I’m not going to see this movie.
But I found your review to be very amusing.
Good job Mike, and thanks for seeing this for me.
That trailer almost had me fooled.
I’d just like to add. The two professional hollywood writers (Ehren Kruger & Roberto Orci) are also so responsible for shit movies like “The Island” and “The Ring 2″. Oh, and I almost forgot, Orci wrote the first “TRANSFORMERS” as well. Man, the hits just keep on coming.

JaySmack on June 18, 2009 at 1:33 am

“Does Michael Bay not know how to make a movie?”

Sadly the answer is a big, fat NO! EXCELLENT review BTW. About damned time somebody said it.

Madwelshboy on June 18, 2009 at 3:46 pm

Oh well, he’s just revealed he wont be back for transformers 3:_

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/a160715/bay-ive-had-enough-of-transformers-world.html

KC on June 18, 2009 at 6:46 pm

Mike, I applaud you for taking one for the team and seeing this garbage. This prevents me from going to see it. I hated the first one, knew it was going to suck and went and saw it anyway since it was a “Transformers” movie. At least now I know nothing has changed so I can avoid this one at all costs. Thank you Mike for saving me precious time and money.

jackburton on June 19, 2009 at 5:27 pm

maybe you guys should change the name of this site to “obsessedwithartfilmscauseweresnobs”? just a thought. if you can’t enjoy giant robots beating the crap out of each other on the big screen and megan fox’s ass sliding all over the place, i gotta tell ya, you dudes don’t actually “enjoy” cinema. you enjoy watching movies about suicidal authors so you can go to starbucks and talk about “what it all means”. really, film school dropouts much?

Galvatron on June 21, 2009 at 2:06 pm

I’m not an art film snob, personally, but I AM a Transformers fan. And Bayformers does nothing but turn my beloved Autobots into bumbling, wise-cracking idiots while the Decepticons are turned into mute, personality-less ciphers.

They didn’t even make that big of a deal in the first Bayformers when Jazz died. Michael Bay doesn’t view the Transformers as actual characters, it seems. And this offends me greatly.

shatteredh on June 23, 2009 at 3:15 pm

Same shit as always. Hey, gagglefucks, if you don’t like Michael Bay movies, then don’t fucking watch them. Morons. Like people who hate Uwe Boll, but go rent his bullshit anyway. If you didn’t like Transformers, or maybe any of the other Bay movies which look exactly the same, then why complain about this one?

What is this imaginary standard that you’re holding it up to anyway? TDK again? Because I’d rather see TF2 this summer instead of whatever JJ Abraham Lincoln cooked up or that retarded GI JOE.

Since when is your nostalgia for whatever TF cartoon that you”grew up” on worth changing an entire movie for anyway?

tub0rg on June 23, 2009 at 6:00 pm

Great review and spot on i might add.

another movie this year that could have been great, but landet in the shitbowl.

and to the trolls:
you can have giant robots and hot asses without being completly braindead.
these things dont exclude one another.

Scott on June 24, 2009 at 6:25 am

1. They are toys. Any personality you hold dear was created by you in your bedroom.

2. If you don’t find the robots awesomely destructive, I think you went into the wrong theater. Maybe you accidentally saw The Proposal. The robots in that thing were pretty tame.

ComicFan on June 24, 2009 at 9:30 pm

I’m sick of people telling that its just a fun blockbuster movie, and that you could shut down your brain and just enjoy 2 hours of meaningless action…

Or that it doesn’t matter if the story/jokes/editing/acting sucks…. YOU GET TO SEE BIG FUCKING ROBOTS FIGHTING!!!… and the FXs are great, and that you shouldn’t expect more from a “fun action movie”

I DO EXPECT MORE!

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/2544/graphic11280.jpg

“you can have giant robots and hot asses without being completly braindead.
these things dont exclude one another.”

I totally agree

The sad thinks is that I’m undecided… this movie sounds really bad, but I like to be informed and to know if I’m gonna like or dislike this film its because I saw it and make my own decision and not because other people hate it…

one way or another I think Hollywood its gonna get my money…

sideshowjim on June 30, 2009 at 4:13 pm

Michael bay actually made giant robots fighting amid huge explosions boring. He spend huge sums of money to achieve this. If anyone else tried, they’d probably end up with something exciting and fun and memorable. Even a team of dullness experts could probably only make a film about giant fighting robots and explosions tedious for about 60% of the run time. But Michael bay, 100% baby! And that’s why he deserves every penny he gets paid!

And the next person I see who says “duh, it’s just a big noisy action movie, you’re a snob, blah blah” is gonna get kerbstomped onto an independance day DVD. Yeah, it doesn’t have to be clever or original or whatever. But it does have to be GOOD. It has to be actually ENTERTAINING. And anyone who loves it because “ooh it’s got transformers in!” should just stare at the poster instead. Is cheaper, and they’ll get the same level of drooling joy out of it.

(Insert Kevin Smith quote here, with “Michael bay” replacing “Jay & silent bob”. You know the one.)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

Register or Login to your account and this info is automatically added!

*
*