Posted by Matt Holmes. Last modified on December 31st, 2007 at 09:00am

TV SPOT: CLOVERFIELD

The biggest compliment that anyone can give J.J. Abrams and Matt Reeves for what they have done with CLOVERFIELD, is how much the movie feels like a huge ‘event’ release and an actual proper film. That’s not to say this is just an experimental movie (it kinda is though) because there’s still a lot riding on whether audiences have been drawn into this or not.

cloverfield.jpg

Yes, it’s only been made on a fraction of what GODZILLA and other huge monsters movies were budgeted at but it still cost $30 million to make. That’s a lot of money and is probably above average for a standard weekend release. A handheld film like this with no stars, a dodgy title which means nothing to you if you don’t have an Internet connection and you never know… a $5 million opening could happen and that would be a disaster.

Personally I think they have done a great job with the marketing for this and it shouldn’t happen, but when GRINDHOUSE failed… you just never know these days…

source - aicn

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

Categories: Movie News, Sci-Fi

No Comments »

There are no comments yet, why not try our new look forum?

Leave a comment

Obsessed With Film © 2008
Our Friends: Digital Photo Frame | Top