#footer { width: 970px; padding: 4px 4px 0 4px; clear: both; margin: 0 auto; display: block; color: #fff; background: #343434; border: 4px solid #110f0f; border-bottom: 0px; height: 420px; } #footer a { color: #fff; font-weight: bold; } #footer a:hover { text-decoration: underline; } .footblock { width: 225px; margin: 0 4px 0 0; padding: 0; float: left; } .footblock h2 {width: 190; padding: 5px 5px 5px 10px; font-size: 2em; background: #231f20; text-transform: uppercase; } .footblock ul { padding: 10px 10px 0 10px; margin: 0; list-style-type: none;} .footblock ul li { font-size: 1.1em; padding-bottom: 6px; } #comments { width: 512px; margin: 0px; } #footer2 a {color: #fff; } #footer2 { width: 946px; height: 14px; background: #184671; border: 4px solid #110f0f; border-bottom: 0px; border-top: 0px; padding: 8px 16px; color: #fff; font-size: 1em; font-weight: bold; clear: both; margin: 0 auto; }
Posted by Matt Holmes
Despite my surprise at the cast 28 Weeks Later has managed to scramble together, I still think the movie is unnecessary.
Sure, the concept of a post-apoclayptic zombie world is very cool, but it was done perfectly fine in the first movie. Move on! I just can’t see where a sequel of 28 Days Later can really go.
Anyway, Blackfilm found through The Movie Blog have got the scoop on some set photo’s from the horror flick, and it looks like they are aiming to keep the same imagery that the original had.
That’s got to be a good thing, as that’s what was most impressive and memorable about it. I loved the way they shot a deserted London and the eerie atmosphere they managed to sustain for the whole film.
Click here to feast your eyes on set pics!
source - blackfilm, the movie blog
categories - Movie News

You got it spot on, the movie IS unnecessary. But I did love the first movie, so I’ll no doubt end up feeling inclined to see this one too.
No, the second movie is ten times better than the first. Even though 28 Weeks could have taken the place of 28 Days, the second one was actually interesting.