<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obsessed With Film &#187; No-Country-for-Old-Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/category/no-country-for-old-men/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com</link>
	<description>Movie News, Movie Reviews and Movie Trailers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Strong joins NOTTINGHAM, nearly became Anton Chigurh &amp; what about Bond?</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/updated-strong-joins-nottingham-nearly-became-anton-chigurh-what-about-bond.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/updated-strong-joins-nottingham-nearly-became-anton-chigurh-what-about-bond.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Holmes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mark Strong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No-Country-for-Old-Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nottingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ridley-Scott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/?p=17588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

UPDATED: I've been informed by Simon at Digital Spy that Strong was misquoted. This revised edition of the article now reflects accurately the actor's quotes. 

The versatile Mark Strong for over ten years has been an actor I've greatly admired, he would pop up in all kinds of genre movies, like most British character actors usually do, and completely steal the screen from the bigger "stars" playing opposite them.

But in the last 12 months or so his career has really, really taken off. After playing a big part in BODY OF LIES, director Ridley Scott has hired him again for his next movie NOTTINGHAM where he will play the villainous Guy of Gisbourne.

In the usual Hood folklore, he is the close adviser to the Sheriff of Nottingham who is given the task to aggressively hunt down the outlaw known as Robin Hood. In the much loved Errol Flynn adaptation of the character, Gisbourne is played by the great Basil Rathbone and is the main adversary of Hood but in the 1991 adaptation he is little more than Alan Rickman's man for hire.

Digital Spy carry these quotes from Strong...
"The script is still fluid, but it's essentially the Guy of Gisborne character. ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/updated-strong-joins-nottingham-nearly-became-anton-chigurh-what-about-bond.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Money for Old Men!</title>
		<link>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/no-money-for-old-men.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/no-money-for-old-men.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Holmes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No-Country-for-Old-Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy-Lee-Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/?p=14904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt here…

Tommy Lee Jones, the lead character (well according to the Academy anyway, and I guess it was his story) of No Country For Old Men is suing Paramount for $10 milllion, the money he claims he is owed for starring in the picture which earned four Oscar nominations last year.


It's claimed that Jones was promised a "significant box-office bonuses" and other similar financial compensation depending on the success of the film, which turned out to be bigger than anyone expected taking in over $160 million worldwide.

Jones, who agreed a relatively small fee to initially star in the picture hoping to make further profit down the line points to errors in his Paramount contract that were never properly rectified, claiming that the studio knew about them before they handed it over to Jones.

Jones is asking that an auditor to look over the contracts and determine how much he should be paid.

More on this in yesterday's VARIETY. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/no-money-for-old-men.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
